Home arrow Management Brief Reports arrow List of Titles arrow Business Continuity Planning

Login Form



Business Continuity Planning
Article Index
Business Continuity Planning
Expert Opinion
Survey and Research
Example Cases
Measure and Evaluate
Summary
References

Survey and Research Data

IT back-up practices vary widely

A survey of 200 IT managers by Imation in 2005 concerning disaster recovery practices found that the main reasons organisations evaluated their data recovery and back up practices were:

  • e-mail viruses (59%)
  • Cyber attacks (31%)
  • Natural disasters (28%)
  • Terrorist attacks (22%)
  • Government regulations (19%)
  • Employee sabotage (17%)
  • Homeland security issues (15%)
  • 71% of the organisations surveyed had disaster recovery plans in place
  • 40% of companies don't test their disaster recovery plan after each update; and
  • 28% percent of companies took a wait-and-see approach.
  • 32% performed scheduled testing and evaluation of their storage backup systems at least quarterly and another 35% did so once a year or less. [10]

Crisis Management and communication plans

In reply to a 2005 global IABC Research Foundation survey concerning the preparation of formal communications plans in the event of natural disaster/organisation crises, respondents reported that:

  • 30% had no formal plan
  • 50% of these unprepared groups needed to rapidly put a plan together in the event of a crisis
  • 69% of organisations having a crisis communication plan had needed to implement it, with 53% partially implementing plans, and 47% fully implementing plans.
  • Of the organisations that partially implemented their plans, "communication with employees" was the most commonly implemented component (95%), followed by "coordination with other departments or units to determine appropriate communication responses" (93%)
  • In regard to the effectiveness of their communication plans; 66% cited the plans as being "very effective," and 33% believed that they were "somewhat effective." [11]

Disaster Recovery (DR) planning – back office operation redundancy (alternative/duplicate systems) valued by banks

The following data was collated from those responding to a 2005 JPMorgan Chase survey concerning disaster recovery planning by US banking organisations:

  • 37% indicated that their organisations were well prepared for natural disasters such as hurricanes.
  • 55% indicated that they were "somewhat prepared"
  • 8% were not prepared
  • 50% had either tested their DR plan, or were expecting to do so. The following aspects were valued most in connection with disaster-recovery planning:
  • Back-office operation redundancy (72%)
  • Communications (68%)
  • Offline business operations (65%)
  • Corporate communications (58%)
  • Employee payroll and emergency funds (49%) [1]

Business Continuity Planning – DR plan testing

In a US Computerworld survey (2004) concerning BCP involving 224 IT managers, respondents replied to the question "when was your organisation's disaster recovery plan last tested?" as follows:

  • Less that one month ago (6%)
  • 1 to 3 months ago (24%)
    • 4 to 6 months ago (18%)
    • 6 to 12 months ago (23%)
    • More that 1 year ago (10%)
    • Don't Know (19%) [12]

_________________________________________________________

You are reading a Management Brief Report in html-format. Become a member of the BPIR to receive a new report in PDF-format every month (see examples: Benchmarking & Business Excellence). PDF-format can be saved on your hard drive, emailed to work colleagues, and are much easier to read and print out!.. For BPIR updates and best practices sign up to our FREE newsletter. 

 
 
< Prev   Next >